<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fred Trotter on open source and the new CCHIT certifications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ehrdecisions.com/2009/06/25/fred-trotter-on-open-source-and-the-new-cchit-certifications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ehrdecisions.com/2009/06/25/fred-trotter-on-open-source-and-the-new-cchit-certifications/</link>
	<description>Electronic Health Record (EHR) information and news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:52:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fred Trotter &#187; Surescripts agrees to modify NDA to be compatible with Open Source licences</title>
		<link>http://ehrdecisions.com/2009/06/25/fred-trotter-on-open-source-and-the-new-cchit-certifications/comment-page-1/#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Trotter &#187; Surescripts agrees to modify NDA to be compatible with Open Source licences</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ehrdecisions.com/?p=678#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>[...] with various organizations. My first opportunity to do this was with CCHIT, that negotiation has turned out pretty well. Then I represented the FOSS community at the NCVHS hearings on Meaningful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with various organizations. My first opportunity to do this was with CCHIT, that negotiation has turned out pretty well. Then I represented the FOSS community at the NCVHS hearings on Meaningful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EMR Benefits</title>
		<link>http://ehrdecisions.com/2009/06/25/fred-trotter-on-open-source-and-the-new-cchit-certifications/comment-page-1/#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator>EMR Benefits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ehrdecisions.com/?p=678#comment-1645</guid>
		<description>Is it great to hear about an Open Source EMR? Yes.  But it&#039;s not so hot if they open source the certifications.  It makes the certifications worthless if just about anyone has an EMR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it great to hear about an Open Source EMR? Yes.  But it&#8217;s not so hot if they open source the certifications.  It makes the certifications worthless if just about anyone has an EMR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Gothard</title>
		<link>http://ehrdecisions.com/2009/06/25/fred-trotter-on-open-source-and-the-new-cchit-certifications/comment-page-1/#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gothard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ehrdecisions.com/?p=678#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>Fred,

I agree with your assesment completely.  One thing I would like to see updated ASAP is the Physician Guide.  That will really tell us if the FOSS is embraced.  Also, I think CCHIT needs to highlight the cost divide between large proprietary EMR vendor&#039;s and FOSS.  The physician community seems to be hearing only one story.  FOSS doesn&#039;t have a bus tour or endless marketing dollars.  What it does have is a solid solution that is now CCHIT and HIPAA compliant and a couple of legislators who would like the FOSS stroy told (for one view see Sen. John D. Rockefeller, April 23, 2009)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred,</p>
<p>I agree with your assesment completely.  One thing I would like to see updated ASAP is the Physician Guide.  That will really tell us if the FOSS is embraced.  Also, I think CCHIT needs to highlight the cost divide between large proprietary EMR vendor&#8217;s and FOSS.  The physician community seems to be hearing only one story.  FOSS doesn&#8217;t have a bus tour or endless marketing dollars.  What it does have is a solid solution that is now CCHIT and HIPAA compliant and a couple of legislators who would like the FOSS stroy told (for one view see Sen. John D. Rockefeller, April 23, 2009)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
